Learning, Teaching and Leadership

Insights on Integrity, Ethics, and Education by Sarah Elaine Eaton, Ph.D.
  • Home
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Bio
  • Publications and Resources
  • Free Resources
 

Branding Universities: Why change isn’t always a good thing

August 21, 2013

The University of Calgary announced today that it is changing its branding. Again. The change is being hailed as a “refreshed system”, “more logically structured” and “streamlined”.

U of C shared a graphic of the “evolution” of its branding in recent decades:

U of C logo

Before 1966, the university was a satellite campus of the University of Alberta. In ’66 it gained its independence as its own institution. You can see the U of A logo in the upper left-hand corner.

Since becoming its own institution, the University of Calgary has had four distinct logos.

Notice what the University of Alberta looks like today:

U of A logo

It still looks pretty much the same as it did in 1966. For a university, arguably, that’s a good thing.

Universities are institutions where tradition, honour and stability are signs of prestige. The more venerable the institution, it seems, the less often it changes its logo. Here’s another example from the University of Cambridge in the U.K.:

200px-University_of_Cambridge_coat_of_arms_official

Cambridge has been around since the year 1205 and yet, there is little historical evidence of much change in its visual branding during the past century at least.

You might argue and say, “Well, that’s an old university in Europe. We are talking about a North American university here.” Let’s consider the logo for Georgetown University in Washington, D.C.:

Georgetown University - logo-banner

Georgetown opened its doors in 1789. There is a plaque embedded into the brick of one of its building with its crest. On the left, you see its current logo. There has been little change in its branding since 1789.

In branding one of the key elements is consistency over long periods of time. Think about McDonalds, Coca Cola or MGM films. You can instantly picture their logos or visual branding in your mind, right?

At institutions of higher learning, the branding isn’t just for the students of today. It is also for the alumni. Possibly even generations of alumni who feel that their experience at the institution forms part of their youth and their identity.

I have to ask myself how radically re-branding a university four times in half a century helps to great a sense of stability or connection over generations of alumni?

There are times when a re-brand is a good thing. If a product, organization or program developed a logo in its very early days that was not very professional — and it shows — then developing a new logo is a way to elevate its sophistication, prestige and overall image. But re-brands are not to be taken lightly in education — particularly not in higher education.

When a client hires me for an educational marketing consulting project, it is very rare that I recommend a complete re-brand of a program or a school. The risks of appearing inconsistent, flighty or unreliable more often than not outweigh the seduction of having something fresh and new.

When it comes to branding, stability and consistency and create a sense of legitimacy, credibility and trustworthiness. In turn, this builds the prestige and honour for the brand. Over time, the brand enjoys higher and higher levels of social esteem. Prestige and honour have to be earned by educational institutions, particularly in today’s world of “pop-up” schools and that takes time… much longer than a decade or two in most cases.

If you are thinking about a re-brand of your school or educational program, think about it long and hard. Weigh the benefits and the risks. Think about the long-term, rather than the short term. Consider the impact on generations of alumni.

Often, it’s better to invest the time upfront to develop a sophisticated logo, crest or shield than can outlive not only this generation of administrators, but the next five generations of administrators, too.

__________________________________

If you enjoyed this post, please “like” it or share it on social media. Thanks!

Share or Tweet this: Branding Universities: Why change isn’t always a good thing  http://wp.me/pNAh3-1DG

Update – January 2018 – This blog has had over 1.8 million views thanks to readers like you. If you enjoyed this post, please “like” it or share it on social media. Thanks!

Sarah Elaine Eaton is a faculty member in the Werklund School of Education, University of Calgary, Canada.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
Like Loading...

Comments Off on Branding Universities: Why change isn’t always a good thing | branding, education, marketing | Tagged: branding, consultant, consulting, education, higher education, logo, management, marketing, Sarah Eaton, Sarah Elaine Eaton, university | Permalink
Posted by Sarah Elaine Eaton, Ph.D.


Successfully promoting and marketing your language program: Webinar follow up

June 15, 2010

If you couldn’t make the webinar check out the webinar recording. Note that this link may ask to download Java onto your computer. If you click “yes”, you’ll be able to access the recording, slides and all the chat that happened during the session.

I’ve archived the slides on Slideshare, here:

Click here for a copy of the handouts from today’s webinar.

_________

Like this post? Share or Tweet it: Successfully promoting and marketing your language program: Webinar follow up http://wp.me/pNAh3-98

Update – January 2018 – This blog has had over 1.8 million views thanks to readers like you. If you enjoyed this post, please “like” it or share it on social media. Thanks!

Sarah Elaine Eaton is a faculty member in the Werklund School of Education, University of Calgary, Canada.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
Like Loading...

Comments Off on Successfully promoting and marketing your language program: Webinar follow up | 101 Ways to Market Your Language Program, language program administration, languages, marketing, second languages, Uncategorized | Tagged: 101 Ways to Market Your Language Program, agents, branding, education, English as a Second Language, ESL, language program administration, language programs, logo, marketing, recruitment, second languages, social media, webinar, webinars | Permalink
Posted by Sarah Elaine Eaton, Ph.D.


  • Professor Sarah Elaine Eaton

    Unknown's avatar

    Dr. Sarah Elaine Eaton is a professor, ethicist, writer, and speaker. She is a strong advocate for integrity and ethics in educational contexts.

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 3,608 other subscribers
  • Archives

    • November 2025
    • October 2025
    • September 2025
    • August 2025
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • June 2024
    • March 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • August 2023
    • June 2023
    • May 2023
    • April 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • August 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • May 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • September 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • October 2014
    • June 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • October 2012
    • September 2012
    • August 2012
    • July 2012
    • June 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010


Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Learning, Teaching and Leadership
    • Join 1,316 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Learning, Teaching and Leadership
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.

    %d