Contract Cheating and Freedom of Expression: How the Chicago Principles Can Help You Promote Academic Integrity on Your Campus

October 4, 2022
woman wearing brown shirt carrying black leather bag on front of library books
Photo by Abby Chung on Pexels.com

It’s that time of the year again, when contract cheating and unethical tutoring companies hand out flyers to students as they enter classrooms and leave them all over campus – littered in classrooms, strewn on benches, tacked to bulletin boards, and so on. Historically, it has been difficult for some schools to have these advertisements removed because the companies behind them have claimed censorship and threatened legal action against the institution. However, there is reason for hope, especially if your school as a Statement on Free Expression. Let me explain.

Although the original Chicago statement – and others that were modelled on it – were created to support freedom of expression, there is a small but important detail about the limitations of free speech on campus that is relevant to academic integrity. In the original version of the Chicago Principles of Freedom of Expression, it states:

“The freedom to debate and discuss the merits of competing ideas does not, of course, mean that individuals may say whatever they wish, wherever they wish. The University may restrict expression that violates the law, that falsely defames a specific individual, that constitutes a genuine threat or harassment, that unjustifiably invades substantial privacy or confidentiality interests, or that is otherwise directly incompatible with the functioning of the University.” (Chicago Principles of Freedom of Expression, p. 2, emphasis added.)

I am not a lawyer, but I am a policy scholar. (You can find out more about my academic work on higher education policy here, here, and here, for example.) When examining policy, the devil is in the details, as they say. In this case, there is an argument to be made that when contract cheating companies and unethical tutoring businesses advertise on our campuses, they are acting in a manner that is directly incompatible with the functioning of the university. As such, the institution has a right to remove advertisements from campus that promote academic misconduct.

Every school that has developed its own statement of free expression based on the Chicago principles may have this important detail included that gives it leverage to curtail the blatant advertising of contract cheating services the school, including those in Canada. For example, in 2019, the Alberta government mandated that all post-secondary institutions in the province develop a statement to affirm freedom of expression that aligned with the Chicago Principles on Free Speech. Like all higher education institutions in the province of Alberta, the University of Calgary followed the government mandate, making a formal public announcement on December 16, 2019 that it had published its Statement on Free Expression. Our institutional Statement on Free Expression is publicly available. For quick reference, here is the .pdf statement: https://www.ucalgary.ca/provost/sites/default/files/StatementonFreeExpression.pdf 

The University of Calgary statement includes this sentence: “Free expression is subject to limitations imposed by law and, on our campuses, by University policies and procedures related to the functioning of the University.”

I brought this detail to the attention of our Provost at the time, Dr. Dru Marshall, pointing out that this could give the university leverage to reasonably remove advertisements for contract cheating services.  The Provost agreed and informed me that she would instruct Caretaking to have the advertisements on campus removed on this basis. We currently have an Interim Provost, Dr. Penny Werthner and I recently brought this information to her attention and she responded that she too, would take action.

Any post-secondary institution that has a Statement on Free Expression based on the Chicago principles, may be in a position to mandate the removal of advertisements that promote academic misconduct. Of course, this would need the agreement of the Provost or equivalent. I am sure that some lawyers could debate the nuances of some of this language and its implications. As I said, I am not a lawyer, but it would seem to me that in the case of Alberta at least, given that the provincial government mandated that every post-secondary institution in the province develop its own Statement on Free Expression based on the Chicago principles, and that universities and colleges across North America have widely adopted such statements that would have no doubt been scrutinized by lawyers ad nauseam, this is a policy loophole that could actually work in favour of the institution. There is a strong argument to be made that removal of advertisements that promote academic misconduct is not censorship, because communications that interfere with the functioning of the university (and that includes communications that promote academic misconduct) can reasonably be removed. This is not censorship; it is protecting the integrity of the institution.

If you live in jurisdiction that does not have legislation prohibiting the supply or advertisement of contract cheating services, but your school has a statement on free expression based on the Chicago principles, here are 5 things you can do:

  • Share this blog post with your Provost / Vice-President Academic (or equivalent). Let them consider how the school’s statement can help to promote academic integrity.
  • Ask the Provost (or equivalent) to instruct the head of caretaking that custodial should be instructed to remove the flyers and other advertisements that litter the classrooms and other areas of campus.
  • Ask the Provost to inform the others on the executive leadership team (e.g., vice provost of student affairs, vice provost of teaching and learning, and so on) and deans to share this information with others in their respective units.
  • Request that this information be shared at the next meeting of the University Senate (or in Alberta, the General Faculties Council) to ensure it is widely communicated.
  • Ask how you can help. If your school has an academic committee or task force, offer to join and actively contribute to the ongoing work of upholding academic integrity at your own institution.

Institutions can take action against contract cheating. The annual International Day of Action Against Contract Cheating is fast approaching. It’s on October 19 this year. If your school hasn’t already signed up, you can still do so. Widespread removal of contract cheating advertisements could be a campus-wide event that students, staff, and administrators all participate in on that day, and every day.

_______________________________

Share or Tweet this: Contract Cheating and Freedom of Expression: How the Chicago Principles Can Help You Promote Academic Integrity on Your Campus – https://drsaraheaton.wordpress.com/2022/10/04/contract-cheating-and-freedom-of-expression-how-the-chicago-principles-can-help-you-promote-academic-integrity-on-your-campus/

This blog has had over 3 million views thanks to readers like you. If you enjoyed this post, please “like” it or share it on social media. Thanks!

Sarah Elaine Eaton, PhD, is a faculty member in the Werklund School of Education, and the Educational Leader in Residence, Academic Integrity, University of Calgary, Canada. Opinions are my own and do not represent those of the University of Calgary.


Now Published: Contract Cheating in Higher Education

August 11, 2022
Eaton, Curtis, Clare, Stoesz, Seeland & Rundle cover

Now published: Contract Cheating in Higher Education: Global Perspectives on Theory, Practice, and Policy (Eaton, Curtis, Stoesz, Clare, Rundle, & Seeland, 2022). This volume, published by Palgrave MacMillan, includes twenty chapters from contributors across Australia, North America, and Europe:

  1. Introduction: Contract cheating and introduction to the problem. – Curtis, G. J., Clare, J., Rundle, K., Eaton, S. E., Stoesz, B. M., & Seeland, J.
  2. What can we learn from measuring crime when looking to quantify the prevalence and incidence of contract cheating? – Clare, J., & Rundle, K.
  3. Limitations of contract cheating research. –  Krásničan, V., Foltýnek, T., & Dlabolová, D. H.
  4. Essay mills and contract cheating from a legal point of view. – Draper, M.
  5. Leveraging college copyright ownership against file-sharing and contract cheating websites. – Seeland, J., Eaton, S. E., & Stoesz, B. M.
  6. The encouragement of file sharing behaviours through technology and social media: Impacts on student cheating behaviours and academic piracy. – Rogerson, A. M.
  7. Higher education assessment design. – Sutherland-Smith, W., & Dawson, P.
  8. Critical thinking as an antidote to contract cheating. – Stoesz, B. M., Eaton, S. E., & Seeland, J.
  9. Contract cheating and the Dark Triad traits. – Baran, L., & Jonason, P. K.
  10. Contract cheating: The influence of attitudes and emotions. – Curtis, G. J., & Tindall, I. K.
  11. Applying situational crime prevention techniques to contract cheating. – Clare, J.
  12. Presentation, Properties and Provenance: the three Ps of identifying evidence of contract-cheating in student assignments. – Crockett, R.
  13. “(Im)possible to prove”: Formalising academic judgement evidence in contract cheating cases using bibliographic forensics. – Ellis, C., Rogerson, A. M., House, D., & Murdoch, K.
  14. Aligning academic quality and standards with academic integrity – Glendinning, I.
  15. Addressing contract cheating through staff-student partnerships. – Lancaster, T.
  16. The extortionate cost of contract cheating. – Veeran-Colton, T., Sefcik, L., & Yorke, J.
  17. The rise of contract cheating in graduate education. –  Parnther, C.
  18. Listening to ghosts: A qualitative study of narratives from contract cheating writers from the 1930s onwards. – Eaton, S. E., Stoesz, B. M., & Seeland, J.
  19. Assessment brokering and collaboration: Ghostwriter and student academic literacies. – Thacker, E. J.
  20. Conclusion – Eaton, S. E., Stoesz, B. M., Seeland, J. Curtis, G. J., Clare, J., & Rundle, K. 

Updates:

October 4, 2022 – The final proofs have been submitted to the publisher. The book now moves into production and should be available very soon!

October 28, 2022 – The book has now been published!

_______________________________

Share or Tweet this: New Book Coming Soon: Contract Cheating in Higher Education – https://drsaraheaton.wordpress.com/2022/08/11/new-book-coming-soon-contract-cheating-in-higher-education/

This blog has had over 3 million views thanks to readers like you. If you enjoyed this post, please “like” it or share it on social media. Thanks!

Sarah Elaine Eaton, PhD, is a faculty member in the Werklund School of Education, and the Educational Leader in Residence, Academic Integrity, University of Calgary, Canada. Opinions are my own and do not represent those of the University of Calgary.


Coming soon… “Ethics and Integrity in Teacher Education” (Eaton & Khan, eds.)

August 2, 2022
An image with written information about the forthcoming book, "Ethics and Integrity in Teacher Education" edited by Sarah Elaine Eaton and Zeenath Reza Khan

Coming soon… “Ethics and Integrity in Teacher Education” (Eaton & Khan, eds.)

 One of the best things about being on Research and Scholarship Leave (RSL, also known as “sabbatical”) is having time to write and do research. I’m super excited to share that my friend and colleague, Dr. Zeenath Reza Khan, and I have just submitted a manuscript for our edited volume, Ethics and Integrity in Teacher Education.

This book was two years in the making. Zeenath and I are both educators in higher education, but like so many others who work in academic integrity, we often hear that students arrive at post-secondary institutions ill-prepared for what awaits them, including expectations about how to uphold and enact academic integrity. We hear cries of frustration that academic integrity education must start much earlier – and we agree. However, for that to happen, teacher trainees must receive direct and explicit training about how to teach concepts and skills related to academic integrity. If this is not embedded within their pre-service teacher education, the teachers themselves are ill equipped to provide students with this important ethical foundation in K-12 education.

We sought out some of the most highly qualified experts in the world on ethics and integrity for this volume. The result is a specialized team of elite scholars from Canada, the US, the UK, Australia, Mexico, Sweden, and the UAE who have contributed chapters on various topics related to how to teach academic integrity and ethics in teacher training programs and in K-12 education.

Here is a “sneak peek” about what to expect…

  • Table of Contents
  • Acknowledgements
  • Preface
  • Chapter 01: Ethics in Teacher Training: An Overview – Sarah Elaine Eaton (Canada) and Zeenath Reza Khan (UAE)
  • Chapter 02: Embedding principles related to academic integrity in teacher education in Australia – Ann Rogerson (Australia), Claire Rogerson (Australia), and Tiffani Apps (Australia)
  • Chapter 03: Using Codes of Professional Ethics and Conduct in Teacher Education: Pitfalls and Best Practice – Daniella Forster (Australia) and Bruce Maxwell (Canada)
  • Chapter 04: Preparing Preservice Teachers to Teach Academic Integrity and Ethics – Sonja Bjelobaba (Sweden) and Marita Cronqvist (Sweden)
  • Chapter 05: Ethics education in teacher education: a comparative study of teacher education programs embedding ethics education into teacher education curriculum – Afnan Boutid (UAE) and Stephanie Martin (UAE)
  • Chapter 06:  Starting from a Place of Academic Integrity: Building Trust with Online Students – Astrid Kendrick (Canada)
  • Chapter 07: The Role of Compassion in Academic Integrity Management Processes –  Luis I. Guerrero-Martínez (Mexico), Pablo Ayala-Enríquez (Mexico), and Jean Guerrero-Dib (Mexico)
  • Chapter 08: Formalising Preservice Teacher Training to Work with Parents to Promote Academic Integrity in K-12 Education – Brenda M. Stoesz (Canada)
  • Chapter 09:  Proposing a preservice teacher-training module to manage parental involvement in K-12 assessments – Zeenath Reza Khan (UAE) and Veena Mulani (UAE)
  • Chapter 10: Incorporating Ethics into Everyday Classroom in Science Education – Shivadas D. Sivasubramaniam (UK)
  • Chapter 11:  Educational Integrity in Schools: A Framework for Young Learners – Irene Glendinning (UK)

This book will be part of the Ethics and Integrity in Educational Contexts book series, published by Springer.

We do not yet have an exact date of when the book will be published, but we expect it might be in late 2022 or early 2023. We’ll provide updates on this blog and on social media about the progress of the book.

_______________________________

Share or Tweet this: Coming soon… “Ethics and Integrity in Teacher Education” (Eaton & Khan, eds.) https://drsaraheaton.wordpress.com/2022/08/02/coming-soon-ethics-and-integrity-in-teacher-education-eaton-khan-eds/

This blog has had over 3 million views thanks to readers like you. If you enjoyed this post, please “like” it or share it on social media. Thanks!

Sarah Elaine Eaton, PhD, is a faculty member in the Werklund School of Education, and the Educational Leader in Residence, Academic Integrity, University of Calgary, Canada. Opinions are my own and do not represent those of the University of Calgary.


Alberta Academic Integrity Week, Oct. 17-21, 2022

June 20, 2022

AB AcInt Week 2022The Alberta Council on Academic Integrity is pleased to announce Academic Integrity Week: October 17-21, 2022.

Here are some ways for educational institutions across the province to get involved:

  • Offer events at your school to promote academic integrity
  • Engage students in conversations about academic integrity
  • Offer skill-building workshops such as citing and referencing workshops
  • Distribute academic integrity swag to students and staff
  • Hold workshops for faculty on topics such as academic misconduct case management
  • Build awareness about the predatory contract cheating industry
  • Connect with your student leaders to plan events and raise awareness
  • Cross-promote workshops and events with other Alberta institutions
  • Join the International Day of Action Against Contract Cheating on October 19, 2022

Share this post: Academic Integrity Week 2022: October 17-21  https://albertaacademicintegrity.wordpress.com/2022/06/20/academic-integrity-week-2022-october-17-21/


Marking the 50-year anniversary of an attempt to legislate against contract cheating in Canada

June 14, 2022

The Society of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education (STLHE) in Canada has launched a new national Committee on Academic Integrity and Contract Cheating (CAICC). With more than 40 members from universities and colleges across Canada, this committee will focus on how to promote academic integrity and take action against term paper mills and other forms of contract cheating.

In my open access book chapter “Contract Cheating in Canada: A Comprehensive Overview”, I provide details of an attempt to legislate against contract cheating. Bill 174 was brought forward in the Ontario provincial legislature by the Hon. Albert Roy on June 14, 1972. I often wonder how different things would be in Canada today if that legislation had passed.

As I was digging into that research, I looked up Albert Roy and found that after he’d left politics, he went on to practice laws and was later appointed as a judge. He appeared to be doing some work for a mediation consultancy firm, so I decided I’d drop him an e-mail to tell him about how important this attempt at legislation was, even if it failed. I never heard back, and I figured he was just busy.

After our book, Academic Integrity in Canada was published, I e-mailed him again to let him know so he could read about how contract cheating in Canada had evolved and what we were doing to take action against it. I never heard back… So a while back, I decided to be cheeky and leave him a voice mail.

Last week on Wednesday when I was attending the Society for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education (STLHE) conference in Ottawa, my phone rang just before lunch. I answered and lo and behold, it was Albert Roy calling me back! He let me know that he’d never received the e-mails but was glad that I phoned.

During our conversation I asked if he’d like me to send him a copy of the book chapter in which I’d written about contract cheating in Canada, including the legislation he’d proposed. He said yes and proceeded to give me his mailing address. After he’d finished, I said,

“You’re in Ottawa!”

“Yes,” he replied.

“I’m in Ottawa! I’m here from Calgary for a conference on teaching and learning in higher education!”

One thing led to another and with the permission of the conference organizers, I asked Albert if he’d might have time and interest to drop by my session on Friday morning. (Of course, I figured he’d be busy, off doing whatever it is that retired people do…) To my utter surprise and delight, he said yes, he’d be happy to stop by.

So, on Friday morning, just as he’d promised, Albert Roy showed up to the Ottawa conference centre and we had a few minutes to chat before the session and even agreed to offer a few remarks.

A group photo with Janice Miller-Young, Albert Roy, and Sarah Elaine Eaton
Left to right: Janice Miller-Young, Albert Roy, and Sarah Elaine Eaton. Photo taken at the 2022 STLHE conference in Ottawa on 10 June, 2022.

We snapped the photo above just before my presentation started. At the beginning of the session I was introduced by Julia Christensen Hughes, who co-edited Academic Integrity in Canada: An Enduring and Essential Challenge with me.

I went through most of my slides. (By the way, you can download a complete copy of my slides from the conference here.)

When I got to the slide about the proposed legislation, I told everyone in the audience that we had the honour of having Albert Roy with us to share some of his insights. We’d kept it under wraps and it was a surprise for just about everyone.

Albert captivated us with his recollections of being called a “radical” and a “communist” for proposing legislation that would have made term papers illegal and also for proposing other legislation mandating the use of seat belts.

Beatriz Moya, a PhD student studying with me at the University of Calgary took a video of Albert Roy’s remarks and later gave us permission to share it:

This was truly an historic moment for us and Albert Roy left us all feeling energized and inspired.

On June 14, 2022, exactly fifty years to the day after Albert Roy proposed legislation that would have made contract cheating illegal in the province of Ontario, we will have the inaugural meeting of our new national committee on academic integrity and contract cheating. We chose the date of our first meeting for its symbolism weeks before Albert Roy and I had a chance to speak on the phone. Now, this date is even more symbolic as more than 40 committee members will gather to talk about the future of academic integrity in Canada, how to protect it and how to uphold it.

I will be forever grateful to Albert Roy for the work he did as a politician and also for the inspiration he brought us fifty years later as we continue the work.

If you’d like to show your appreciation to Albert Roy for his efforts to legislate against contract cheating, join the thank you card campaign.

Related posts:

New book: Academic Integrity in Canada

Contract Cheating in Canada: Exploring Legislative Options

_______________________________

Share or Tweet this: Marking the 50-year anniversary of an attempt to legislate against contract cheating in Canada https://drsaraheaton.wordpress.com/2022/06/14/marking-the-50-year-anniversary-of-an-attempt-to-legislate-against-contract-cheating-in-canada/

This blog has had over 3 million views thanks to readers like you. If you enjoyed this post, please “like” it or share it on social media. Thanks!

Sarah Elaine Eaton, PhD, is a faculty member in the Werklund School of Education, and the Educational Leader in Residence, Academic Integrity, University of Calgary, Canada. Opinions are my own and do not represent those of the University of Calgary.