Time Management Tips and Goal-Setting for Graduate Students

January 6, 2025

This post is for my grad students, but may be of interest to others, too.

For as long as I can remember, I’ve started each year by setting goals for the year and sometimes even for multiple years. Call it a quest for independence, a desire for self-determination, or a way to keep myself from getting down in the dumps as the shininess of a new year wears off and the drudgery of February descends.

SMART Goals

Some years ago I learned about SMART (specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound) goals. That has been a helpful framework for me, but I have also struggled to keep my thinking flexible when setting goals. Having a framework and being flexible with that framework, rather than adhering to it strictly, is ongoing goal.

Write Down the Goals

I write down my goals and I also keep To Do Lists. This helps me to keep track of what goals I set and their due dates. Now, due dates get shifted sometimes, but I am more likely to meet my goals and complete the tasks that help me achieve them if I give myself a deadline.

Some of my Favourite Tools

An alumnus from our school of education introduced me to Magic To Do Goblin Tools a while back. It’s an AI app that helps break down a big task into smaller tasks.

I also use Google sheets to create To Do lists. I used to use a word processor for this, but over time I have migrated to spreadsheets because I like being able to sort the columns by different categories such as due dates, tasks completed, and so on. One reason I use Google sheets is that I like being able to access it from any device, anywhere in the world.

Back during the pandemic, Phill Dawson and I were working on our respective books. He was writing Defending Assessment in a Digital World and I was writing Plagiarism in Higher Education: Tackling Tough Topics in Academic Integrity. He posted on Twitter that he was using WriteTrack ( to help him complete the book. I checked it out and immediately signed up. This has been one of the single most helpful tools to help me complete large writing projects that have a target word count. I recommend it to students who are writing a thesis or anyone tackling a big writing project.

Microgoals

For me, one of the things that I have found helpful, is to break down big goals into smaller ones. I break the smaller ones in to even smaller ones. I keep going until I have micro goals, which for me are small things I can do in half an hour or less.

My preference is to have big chunks of time (at least three or four hours of uninterrupted time) to work on projects. Most days I do not have that luxury, which is frustrating, but also outside of my control. Instead, I try to do micro tasks throughout the day that require less focus, so that when the opportunity comes to have an hour or more to work on a task, I am less preoccupied with other chores or deliverables that need to get done. Five minutes to fill out and submit a form for a graduate student’s progress. Ten minutes to load the dishwasher. Fifteen minutes to answer some e-mails.

Some days I do not have time to read an entire article or an entire chapter of a book, so my microgoal is to simply open the .pdf, scan the title and read the abstract. I might add the article to my EndNote library. That’s another micro task. Even if I cannot complete an entire task, I try to make some progress, however small it may seem.

Some microtasks are things that I don’t particularly enjoy doing, but they are responsibilities and I just need to get them done. Other micro tasks are things I really wish I could spend more time on. Either way, doing something rather than nothing means we are making progress.

Monitor Your Progress and Celebrate Small Wins

The point is to find tools that work for us to declare and then monitor our progress. Making some progress is better than making no progress at all. Things sometimes (often?) take longer than we anticipate, but the goal might still be worth working towards. Monitoring progress and celebrating the small steps is an important part of the process. We do what we can, and we can feel proud of that.

Expect the Unexpected

One of the things I struggle with is being interrupted. If I am focused on a task and I am interrupted, sometimes it can feel like the whole day is ruined. One of my daily challenges is dealing with abrupt or unexpected changes that can take me away from something I am working on. My reality is that most days are full of interruptions. It’s one of the reasons I often get up early to work on important projects. I often say that by the time 09:00 a.m. rolls around, I can’t get any more work done for the day. I say it in jest, but there’s a kernel of truth in there.

I have learned to expect the unexpected and assume that my day will include interruptions that I have no control over. For me this means bracing myself for incidents, e-mails, or the cat throwing up a hair ball that will demand my attention and throw me off balance. It’s not that learning to expect the unexpected means that I am suddenly able to regain my balance, but rather that I accept that I may be in a sustained state of internal imbalance due to factors outside my control. I practice breathing and just carrying on… however off kilter I may feel.

Anticipate the Need for Extra Time

One of the reasons I like to think I’m good at time management is because I often allow extra time for tasks. I block travel time in my calendar to get to work, for example. I tend to allow more time than I might need on an average day, so that if traffic is heavy or if there’s an accident on the road, I have built some buffer into my schedule. On days when I arrive to work a little bit early, I can spend a bit of extra time getting ready for my meetings or chatting with people I run into along the way.

For me, anticipating I may need more time than a task might require, helps me cope when unexpected things happen. It also helps me to limit the number of tasks I expect of myself in a day. Because I tend to over-schedule and over-plan, limiting the number of tasks in a day can actually be helpful for me.

Release the Day

Set daily goals that you can realistically achieve. If you do not achieve them by the end of the day, then release them… At the end of the day, say to yourself, “Today is over and I have done my best. Tomorrow is a new day.” Set concrete and small goals for the next day and when you wake up, review your list. Look at it throughout the day. Do what you can. Then, at the end of that day, accept that the day is over, you have done your best, release what you did not accomplish and if possible, move those goals to the next day.

I have too many things on my lists for me to accomplish them all. When I was younger, I would get very upset with myself for not achieving everything on my To Do List. One of the most powerful techniques I learned was to ‘release the day’. At the end of every day, I review what tasks I accomplished. (Sometimes I even book in relaxation as a goal and that one is always a challenge for me.)

At the end of the day, say to yourself, “Today is over and I have done my best. Tomorrow is a new day.” in my mind, I close the day and release myself from any guilt, sadness, or anger that I have not made as much progress on my To Do List. There are a limited number of hours in each day and I do what I can. 

I forgive myself for whatever didn’t get done and give myself permission to start tomorrow as a new day. Each day is its own little time capsule. Success happens from doing many small tasks over time to achieve a big goal.

Limit the Worrying

This can be easier said than done. For me at least, worry is like an evil monster that can block me from making any progress at all. Worrying can be normal, but worrying too much can prohibit us from making progress on small things we can do today. By anticipating the unexpected, anticipating the need for extra time, and releasing the day, I tend to worry less.

Little Steps Towards Big Goals

I often tell graduate students that I work with that we complete our academic programs as a result of doing many little tasks every day that help propel us towards their overall goal. Of course, there are big program milestones: completion of individual courses, followed by completion of all the required courses, writing the thesis proposal, the candidacy exam, the final oral defence, and then graduation. These big milestones are way points along the journey. Each and every step along the path matters though. No matter how small, even one step helps get us closer to our goals.

Ask for (and Accept) Help

Asking for help can be a challenge. I am not always great at asking for help, but whether I like it or not, there are a lot of things I am either not good at or just cannot do for one reason or another. As a supervisor, there are certain things I can help my students with, but there are other things that I can’t do. For example, if a student is experiencing high levels of anxiety, demand avoidance or task initiation paralysis, I can listen and be supportive, and I may recommend that the students seek additional support from a qualified therapist or counsellor. I am aware that my role as an academic supervisor has some constraints and I am not qualified to serve as a proxy therapist for a student who needs more support than I can give. In these cases, I see my role is one of helping students recognize that they may need extra support and provide referrals to the Student Wellness centre, were further diagnostics or support can be provided.

I might share that when I was a graduate student, I myself got help from counsellors along my journey who helped me manage my anxiety, sleep better, and helped me achieve my goals. Sometimes that disclosure helps and sometimes it doesn’t. If a student is resistant to seeking help, I recognize that ultimately, they own that resistance, not me. Everyone’s journey is personal.

Concluding remarks

A new year brings an opportunity for a re-set. We can acknowledge and celebrate what we achieved in the previous year as we look ahead to new challenges, new experiences, highs, lows, and everything in between. It’s not that the journey is always fun, because it’s not. The journey itself is difficult, with many twists and turns, with unexpected obstacles along the way. The point is to keep working towards our goals, little by little, while still taking time to rest and rejuvenate, so we have the energy to keep going.

Related posts (ones that might of special interest to students)

________________________

Share this post: Time Management Tips and Goal-Setting for Graduate Students – https://drsaraheaton.com/2025/01/06/time-management-tips-and-goal-setting-for-graduate-students/

This blog has had over 3.7 million views thanks to readers like you. If you enjoyed this post, please ‘Like’ it using the button below or share it on social media. Thanks!

Sarah Elaine Eaton, PhD, is a Professor and Research Chair in the Werklund School of Education at the University of Calgary, Canada. Opinions are my own and do not represent those of my employer. 


Three tips for future-proofing academic and research integrity this year

January 2, 2025

In my 2024 annual editorial for the International Journal for Educational Integrity, was entitled, ’Future-proofing integrity in the age of artificial intelligence and neurotechnology: prioritizing human rights, dignity, and equity

Here are three things you can do to prioritize human rights and dignity when it comes to policies and procedures to address allegations of academic or research misconduct:

Use a human-rights-by-design approach to developing, revising, and implementing policies by conducting a comprehensive review of existing academic integrity policies. Update policies to explicitly incorporate human rights principles, ensuring they address fair process, privacy, equitable treatment, and respect for human dignity. It is essential to involve individuals from representative groups in this process.

Provide ongoing training, education, and support to faculty, staff, and students about human rights principles and how they apply to misconduct investigations and case management. Create orientation programs that explain expectations for ethical conduct while respecting diverse cultural perspectives. Offer workshops and resources, peer mentoring programs, and support services.

Focus on continuous improvement and quality assurance of ethics and integrity practices by gathering feedback from students, faculty, staff and relevant stakeholders. Regularly review misconduct case management processes and data to ensure equitable treatment across different demographics.

Implementing human rights principles into misconduct investigations and case management helps to create more effective and sustainable learning environments. This approach prioritizes people over punishment, dignity over draconianism, and compassion over callousness.

Read the full article here: https://edintegrity.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1007/s40979-024-00175-2 

Related post:

Future-proofing integrity in the age of artificial intelligence and neurotechnology: Prioritizing human rights, dignity, and equity

________________________

Share this post: Three tips for future-proofing academic and research integrity this year – https://drsaraheaton.com/2025/01/02/three-tips-for-future-proofing-academic-and-research-integrity-this-year/

This blog has had over 3 million views thanks to readers like you. If you enjoyed this post, please “like” it or share it on social media. Thanks!

Sarah Elaine Eaton, PhD, is a Professor and Research Chair in the Werklund School of Education at the University of Calgary, Canada. Opinions are my own and do not represent those of my employer. 


Ethical Reasons to Avoid Using AI Apps for Student Assessment

September 10, 2024

It’s the start of a new school year here in North America. We are into the second week of classes and already I am hearing from administrators in both K-12 and higher education institutions who are frustrated with educators who have turned to ChatGPT and other publicly-available Gen AI apps to help them assess student learning.

Although customized AI apps designed specifically to assist with the assessment of student learning already exist, many educators do not yet have access to such tools. Instead, I am hearing about educators turning to large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT to help them provide formative or summative assessment of students’ work. There are some good reasons not to avoid using ChatGPT or other LLMs to assess student learning.

I expect that not everyone will agree with these points, please take them with the spirit in which they are intended, which to provide guidance on ethical ways to teach, learn, and assess students’ work.

8 Tips on Why Educators Should Avoid Using AI Apps to Help with Assessment of Student Learning

Intellectual Property

In Canada at least, a student’s work is their intellectual property. Unless you have permission to use it outside of class, then avoid doing so. The bottom line here is that student’s intellectual work is not yours to share to a large-language model (LLM) or any other third party application, with out their knowledge and consent.

Privacy

A student’s personal data, including their name, ID number and other details should never be uploaded to an external app without consent. One reason for this blog post is to respond to stories I am hearing about educators uploading entire student essays or assignments, including the cover page with all the identifying information, to a third-party GenAI app.

Data security

Content uploaded to an AI tool may be added to its database and used to train the tool. Uploading student assignments to GenAI apps for feedback poses several data security risks. These include potential breaches of data storage systems, privacy violations through sharing sensitive student information, and intellectual property concerns. Inadequate access controls or encryption could allow unauthorized access to student work. 

AI model vulnerabilities might enable data extraction, while unintended leakage could occur through the AI app’s responses. If the educator’s account is compromised, it could expose all of the uploaded assignments. The app’s policies may permit third-party data sharing, and long-term data persistence in backups or training sets could extend the risk timeline. Also, there may be legal and regulatory issues around sharing student data, especially for minors, without proper consent.

Bias

AI apps are known to be biased. Feedback generated by an AI app can be biased, unfair, and even racist. To learn more check out this article published in Nature. AI models can perpetuate existing biases present in their training data, which may not represent diverse student populations adequately. Apps might favour certain writing styles (e.g., standard American English), cultural references, or modes of expression, disadvantaging students from different backgrounds. 

Furthermore, the AI’s feedback could be inconsistent across similar submissions or fail to account for individual student progress and needs. Additionally, the app may not fully grasp nuanced or creative approaches, leading to standardized feedback that discourages unique thinking.

Lack of context

An AI app does not know your student like you do. Although GenAI tools can offer quick assessments and feedback, they often lack the nuanced understanding of a student’s unique context, learning style, and emotional or physical well-being. Overreliance on AI-generated feedback might lead to generic responses, diminishing the personal connection and meaningful interaction that educators provide, which are vital for effective learning.

Impersonal

AI apps can provide generic feedback, but as an educator, you can personalize feedback to help the student grow. AI apps can provide generic feedback but may not help to scaffold a student’s learning. Personalized feedback is crucial, as it fosters individual student growth, enhances understanding, and encourages engagement with the material. Tailoring feedback to specific strengths and weaknesses helps students recognize their progress and areas needing improvement. In turn, this helps to build their confidence and motivation. 

Academic Integrity

Educators model ethical behaviour, this includes transparent and fair assessment. If you are using tech tools to assess student learning, it is important to be transparent about it. In this post, I write more about how and why deceptive and covert assessment tactics are unacceptable.

Your Employee Responsibilities

If your job description includes assessing student work , you may be violating your employment contract if you offload assessment to an AI app.

Concluding Thoughts

Unless your employer has explicitly given you permission to use AI apps for assessing student work then, at least for now, consider providing feedback and assessment in the ways expected by your employer. If we do not want students to use AI apps to take shortcuts, then it is up to us as educators to model the behavior we expect from students.

I understand that educators have excessive and exhausting workloads. I appreciate that we have more items on our To Do Lists than is reasonable. I totally get it that we may look for shortcuts and ways to reduce our workload. The reality is that although Gen AI may have the capability to help with certain tasks, not all employers have endorsed their use in same way.

Not all institutions or schools have artificial intelligence policies or guideline, so when in doubt, ask your supervisor if you are not sure about the expectations. Again, there is a parallel here with student conduct. If we expect students to avoid using AI apps unless we make it explicit that it is OK, then the same goes for educators. Avoid using unauthorized tech tools for assessment without the boss knowing about it.

I am not suggesting that Gen AI apps don’t have the capability to assist with AI, but I am suggesting that many educational institutions have not yet approved the use of such apps for use in the workplace. Trust me, when there are Gen AI apps to help with the heaviest aspects of our workload as educators, I’ll be at the front of the line to use them. In the meantime, there’s a balance to be struck between what AI can do and what one’s employer may permit us to use AI for. It’s important to know the difference — and to protect your livelihood.

Related post:

The Use of AI-Detection Tools in the Assessment of Student Work https://drsaraheaton.wordpress.com/2023/05/06/the-use-of-ai-detection-tools-in-the-assessment-of-student-work/

____________________________

Share this post:
Ethical Reasons to Avoid Using AI Apps for Student Assessment – https://drsaraheaton.com/2024/09/10/ethical-reasons-to-avoid-using-ai-apps-for-student-assessment/

This blog has had over 3.6 million views thanks to readers like you. If you enjoyed this post, please “like” it or share it on social media. Thanks!

Sarah Elaine Eaton, PhD, is a faculty member in the Werklund School of Education at the University of Calgary, Canada. Opinions are my own and do not represent those of my employer.

Sarah Elaine Eaton, PhD, Editor-in-Chief, International Journal for Educational Integrity


How to Get Your Academic Article Published in a High Quality Journal

January 2, 2024
An info graphic with a title, by-line and five blocks of text. There is a graphic of a pencil with five arrows coming out of it.

This month marks the beginning of my fourth year as editor-in-chief of the International Journal for Educational Integrity. Before that I served as co-editor and before that, I served as a reviewer and article author. Last year, the journal received its first impact factor (4.6), putting it in the 95th percentile of all journals in the field of educational research. Since that happened, the number of submissions the journal has received seems to have skyrocketed. Every week I am reviewing submissions from authors eager to have their work published in a Q1 (top quartile) academic journal. In this post I offer five tips on how to get your work published in a top-ranking journal.

Tip #1: Read the Aims and Scope

Ensure your manuscript fits with the aims and scope of the journal. The number one reason I reject manuscripts outright without sending them for peer review is that the topic of the manuscript has no relevance whatsoever to our journal. Reputable journals publish their aims and scope on their website. As an example, here are the Aims and Scope of the International Journal for Educational Integrity

As an interdisciplinary journal, we receive submissions from just about every academic field you can imagine, but just because a journal is interdisciplinary does not mean that anything goes. When I get a manuscript about the efficacy rates of a pesticide or new developments related to geo-spatial heat maps, I reject it automatically because the topic is outside the scope of our journal. Manuscripts that are about education broadly, but that have no direct connection to ethics and integrity, also get a desk rejection.

If you want to publish your article in a high quality journal, ensure it aligns with the aims and scope of the journal.

Tip #2: Focus on Quality

Poor-quality writing is one of the main reasons manuscripts get a desk rejection. Ensure the quality of your manuscript is your top priority. Markers of quality include, but are not limited to, writing that is comprehensible and error-free. (The odd typo can be fixed during the revision process.) Quality also means including a literature review that demonstrates that you understand previous scholarship in the field, a detailed methods section, and an in-depth analysis. The findings should show original contributions to the field, along with the limitations of the work.

Articles that are theoretical or conceptual in nature should still have a clear structure and be organized in a way that the reader can follow. The problem/gap/hook heuristic is one way to frame a conceptual article so that the value to the reader is clear.

Submissions that are difficult to read, either because of poor writing or because they lack organization, are more likely to be rejected. This does not mean that all articles have to follow a cookie-cutter formula. Unconventional articles can be interesting and valuable, but the reader still has to be able to follow them.

Tip #3: Follow the Submission Guidelines

Ensure your submission fits with the submission guidelines of the journal. Do not wait for a desk rejection and then tell the editor you can reformat the manuscript. Submit according to the guidelines.

I have had prospective authors argue with me via e-mail when I reject or request a revision to their submissions on the basis that their manuscript does not follow the journal’s guidelines. Arguing with an editor about how you do not have time or interest in submitting according to the journal’s guidelines is unlikely to persuade an editor that your submission should be reviewed. Saying that you will revise or reformat the submission only if your article is accepted is a fast track to a rejection.

Tip #4: Do Your Homework

Read recently published articles in the journal to understand what kinds of submissions make the cut. It can also be helpful to understand who the editors and editorial board members are and how their expertise contributes to the journal.

I reviewed a submission that claimed that female students were inherently prone to academic cheating because of their gender. (The main argument was that women are more morally corrupt than men.) Um…. Pardon me?!

Needless to say that the submission was problematic (and rejected) for a number of reasons, not the least of which was a lack of scientific basis for the claims made in the submission. As I conducted my preliminary editorial review, it occurred to me that the authors probably had no idea that the editor was a woman… And why would they, when only 8% of editors-in-chief of academic journals are women? It might not have even occurred to them to check. (If they had, they could have saved themselves the trouble of submitting…)

A quick check of the Editorial Board can give you a glimpse into who provides leadership for a journal. Reviewing the information about the editorial board is likely to provide an incomplete picture at best, but it can be helpful.

Tip #5: Provide Value 

Ensure that your manuscript adds something new to the existing knowledge base. The best academic articles provide value to the reader and the wider scientific or scholarly community. Always keep your reader in mind. One reason submissions get rejected is that the authors are so self-absorbed in themselves and their own ideas or goals is that they fail to consider individual readers as well as the collective readership of the journal as a whole.

When prospective authors beg me to publish their article because they need a publication to graduate, get hired, keep their jobs, or get promoted, my heart aches. This is a sign of systemic dysfunction of academia in general, but it is a one that a journal editor cannot solve. The article itself must provide value to the reader or the piece is unlikely to get published. The more value you can provide to the readers, the more likely it is your manuscript will be published in a high-quality journal.

There are lots of other things to say about how to get your work published in a high-quality academic journal, but I’ll stop for now, as this covers some of the basics. I hope these tips are helpful for getting your academic work published in the coming year(s).

____________________________

Share this post: How to Get Your Academic Article Published in a High Quality Journal – https://drsaraheaton.wordpress.com/2024/01/02/how-to-get-your-academic-article-published-in-a-high-quality-journal/

This blog has had over 3 million views thanks to readers like you. If you enjoyed this post, please “like” it or share it on social media. Thanks!

Sarah Elaine Eaton, PhD, is a faculty member in the Werklund School of Education at the University of Calgary, Canada. Opinions are my own and do not represent those of my employer.

Sarah Elaine Eaton, PhD, Editor-in-Chief, International Journal for Educational Integrity


Forthcoming book: Fake Degrees and Fraudulent Credentials in Higher Education

October 16, 2022
Front cover of the book, Fake Degrees and Fraudulent Credentials in Higher Education, edited by Sarah Elaine Eaton, Jamie Carmichael, and Helen Pethrick. Published 2023 by Springer.

We are pleased to share the news that our edited book, Fake Degrees and Fraudulent Credentials in Higher Education, has been submitted for publication (Eaton, Carmichael, and Pethrick, eds.) to Springer Nature. The book is slated for publication in early 2023.

Book description

This book addresses an important topic in higher education: credential fraud. This includes, but is not limited to, fake degrees, diploma mills, admissions fraud, and cheating on standardized admissions tests. The book directly addresses fake and fraudulent credentials in higher education. It explores transcript tampering and fraud in varsity athletics and discusses lazy practices in the higher education hiring processes that open the door for professors without proper credentials to get jobs in post-secondary institutions. 

The book also discusses how technology is being used to stop the proliferation of fake and fraudulent credentials in a variety of ways, including blockchain technology.

Table of Contents

Here is a sneak preview of the table of contents:

Chapter 1: Fake Degrees and Credential Fraud, Contract Cheating, and Paper Mills: Overview and Historical Perspectives – Sarah Elaine Eaton & Jamie Carmichael

Chapter 2: Admissions Fraud in Canadian Higher Education – Jamie Carmichael & Sarah Elaine Eaton

Chapter 3: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow: A Tour of Axact, the “World’s Largest Diploma Mill” – Allen Ezell

Chapter 4: Bridging Today to Tomorrow: A Historical and Technological Review of Credential Exchange in Higher Education within Canada – Joanne Duklas

Chapter 5: Fair play, Fraud, or Fixed? Athletic Credentials in US Higher Education – Kirsten Hextrum

Chapter 6: Corruption in Admissions, Recruitment, Qualifications and Credentials: from Research into Quality Assurance – Stella-Maris Orim & Irene Glendinning

Chapter 7: Avoiding Favouritism in the Recruitment Practice of Turkish Higher Education Institutions Özgür Çelik & Salim Razı

Chapter 8: None of the Above: Integrity Concerns of Standardized English Proficiency Tests – Soroush Sabbaghan & Ismaeil Fazel

Chapter 9: Examining the Problem of Fraudulent English Test Scores: What Can Canadian Higher Education Institutions Learn? – Angela Clark

Chapter 10: There is no culture? A Framework for Addressing Admissions Fraud – Brendan DeCoster

Chapter 11: Security Risks, Fake Degrees, and Other Fraud: A Topic Modelling Approach – Jamie Carmichael & Sarah Elaine Eaton 

Chapter 12: Are You for Real? Lessons for the Academy About Professors with Fake or Fraudulent Degrees – Sarah Elaine Eaton & Jamie Carmichael

Chapter 13: Fake Degrees and Fake Degrees and Fraudulent Credentials in Higher Education: Conclusions and Future Directions – Jamie Carmichael & Sarah Elaine Eaton

About the editors

Sarah Elaine Eaton

Werklund School of Education, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Sarah Elaine Eaton, PhD, is an Associate Professor of Education at the University of Calgary, Canada, where she also serves as the inaugural Educational Leader in Residence, Academic Integrity. Eaton’s research focuses on academic ethics in higher education. Her work can be found in the British Educational Research Journal, the Journal of Academic Ethics, the Journal of Educational Thought and Interchange, among other places. She is the Editor-in-Chief of the International Journal for Educational Integrity (Springer Nature) and co-founder and co-editor of Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity. In 2020 she received the national Research and Scholarship award from the Canadian Society for the Study of Higher Education (CSSHE) for her contributions to research on academic integrity in Canadian higher education.

Jamie J. Carmichael

Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Jamie Carmichael is the Associate Registrar of Scheduling and Systems at Carleton University. She is responsible for the construction of the university timetable, scheduling and administration of examinations, the operation of two examination centres for students with disabilities, a university-wide space management system, and other core student administrative systems. Since 2009, she has received ten service excellence nominations for her work that ranges from information technology projects, team acknowledgment to innovation.

Carmichael’s research lies at the intersection of academic integrity and machine learning, with graduate education in Applied Science in Technology Information Management (Engineering). She has presented or co-presented at national and international conferences and is often called up on by specialized groups in higher education to present on her work.

Helen Pethrick

University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Helen Pethrick, MA, is a researcher and educator in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Research areas include academic integrity in higher education, post-secondary student mental health and well-being, and peer mentorship in educational settings.

Related posts:

Fake Degrees and Fraudulent Credentials: Research Project Update

Scholarships Without Scruples: 3 Signs of Bogus Scholarships and Scams

Why Universities and Colleges Need Clear Policies to Deal with Fake COVID-19 Vaccination Records and Test Results

Degrees of Deceit: A Webinar

_________________________________

Share or Tweet this: Forthcoming book: Fake Degrees and Fraudulent Credentials in Higher Educationhttps://drsaraheaton.wordpress.com/2022/10/16/forthcoming-book-fake-degrees-and-fraudulent-credentials-in-higher-education/

This blog has had over 3 million views thanks to readers like you. If you enjoyed this post, please “like” it or share it on social media. Thanks!

Sarah Elaine Eaton, PhD, is a faculty member in the Werklund School of Education, and the Educational Leader in Residence, Academic Integrity, University of Calgary, Canada. Opinions are my own and do not represent those of the University of Calgary.